Wednesday, February 6, 2013

February Book Review Club



Click icon for more
book review blogs
@Barrie Summy

"Scattered flurries" are accumulating on the ground as I write this--a joyful sight in a snowless Maine winter, although I doubt it will be deep enough to ski on it. Nothing for it but to settle down by the woodstove with a good book. Not sure this one will cheer you up--better try it with a sun lamp. 

Don't forget to click the icon for more reviews!

By J.K. Rowling
Little, Brown & Company, 2012

Every Christmas, my man Rob and I give each other nothing but books, all purchased from our crackerjack independent bookstore, Blue Hill Books. Although the staff there know our tastes and are remarkably astute advice-givers, I also take the precaution of mentioning (loudly, and with heft) what it is I’m hoping to read.

This year, as Samantha and I chatted over the front counter, I said I really didn’t think I could handle THE CASUAL VACANCY, the first book for adults by celebrated Harry Potter author J.K. Rowling. This lodged in her overtaxed holiday brain as “Ellen wants that book,” and so she instructed Rob.

You’ve probably read the excoriating reviews this book received, so you know I was expecting the worst: Drab, depressing characters going nowhere in a badly written novel.  I actually considered returning it, but then I flipped a few pages.

And by gorry, the writing grabbed me, with that odd mix of coziness and cynicism common to a lot of British novelists of a half-century ago or more: Kingley Amis, for example, or Muriel Spark. Not to modern tastes, perhaps, but for a throw-back like me it was manna.

Here’s one small-town character’s reaction to the book’s catalyst, the death of Parish Councilor Barry Fairbrother:

Naturally Shirley had known, as they slid stock words and phrases back and forth between them like beads on an abacus, that Howard must be as brimful of ecstasy as she was; but to express these feelings out loud, when the news of the death was still fresh in the air, would have been tantamount to dancing naked and shrieking obscenities, and Howard and Shirley were clothed, always, in an invisible layer of decorum that they never laid aside.

Okay, that’s one of the world’s longest sentences, but I’m sucked right in by the abacus imagery and the dancing-naked/clothed-in-decorum juxtaposition, not to mention the insight into this awful marriage.

The book does have serious problems. Oddly, considering that the characters are so well drawn, I had a heck of a time keeping them straight in my head. There are so many of them, and all of them with equal weight—nobody’s the protagonist, except maybe the dead guy. Halfway through the book, I still couldn’t remember who was married to whom and had which kids. It made me determined to re-read Anthony Trollope, the nineteenth century novelist who did the same type of casting but still managed to keep everyone screamingly distinct.  

Although Rowling’s wry humor is well represented, there’s no arguing that her book is relentlessly depressing. And you struggle to like any of the small-minded, drug-addled, unhappily mated characters. I kept thinking of E.F. Benson, whose Lucia novels of the 1920s and 30s followed the machinations of a bunch of provincial social climbers. Lucia and friends start out in the first chapter as barely likeable figures of satire, but Benson slowly falls in love with them—especially Lucia—and starts giving them some qualities that will make us love them, too.

Rowling doesn't seem to have fallen in love with these characters, although she’s more sympathetic to the miserable teens than to the damaged and damaging adults.   

I’m not sure this book would have been published if it hadn't had Rowling’s name on it--not because it's bad, but because it's delightfully old-fashioned. I also don't think it would have been so badly reviewed if everybody hadn't been expecting a more adult Harry Potter.

Despite the difficulties, I’m glad I read it--partly because I really did admire the writing, and technique was not the Potter novels’ strong suit. But also it gives me hope that, having rid her system of the unused profanities and angst she’d built up up through seven kids’ fantasies, Rowling will write a real winner the next time.


9 comments:

Stacy Nyikos said...

I have been wondering about this book. Thanks so much for reviewing it!

Jennifer A. Jilks said...

Enlightening review! I likely won't read it, though!!!

Linda McLaughlin said...

I, too, have been hesitant to read the book, partly because it's so long and partly because I feared it would be depressing. It's such a change from the Potter books, though they became very dark indeed. I saw an interesting interview with J.K. Rowling on Charlie Rose and it sounded like this book is fairly personal to her, given her history of being on the dole. But I'm still not ready to tackle it just yet. Thanks for the thoughtful review.

Ellen Booraem said...

Oooh,I'll have to find that Charlie Rose interview. I bet it's fascinating.

This definitely is worth reading, but it is more a task than a pleasure, I'm afraid.

Sarah Laurence said...

My son claims that a blizzard is coming our way Thursday night through Saturday morning with up to 18-24 inches! If it doesn’t miss us by drifting south. It's on the gov't weather warning website.

I love your book buying Xmas tradition. I was similarly put off by reviews of this book, but that excerpt you chose does capture the Brits. Too many characters and no protagonist would be problematic and relentlessly depressing wouldn’t work for me. Excellent, insightful review – now I don’t need to read the book myself! I’m eagerly awaiting Rowling’s next children’s book.

Alyssa Goodnight said...

Loved the last paragraph of the this review! :)

Glad you at least enjoyed it, even if you never really wanted it...

Anonymous said...

Hmmmm, now I might have to read it, but I usually skip over the long, descriptive parts, so in otherwords, it`ll be a quick read? Sweet!

Kzspot

My word authentication thingie was ridiumn. First I thought it was a spell word from Harry Potter, but now I think it is a little known element, like vanadium. I`m pretty sure. :P

Barrie said...

Ellen, I must admit that I love reading your reviews. Not just because they're insightful. But because I feel as though you're talking to me over a cup of coffee. Hopefully, that happens some day. :) Thanks for joining in. I may try this book....especially given my current addiction to Downton Abbey!

Ellen Booraem said...

Thanks, Barrie! I missed Downton last night--going to catch up tonight online! Can't wait...